Hello guests,

Here you can post a comment about something.

Alarmists who are too shy to register can post here as well.

Can I post this i dare you.

Why are there no alarmists here? keeping them out I bet because you little boys are to scared of some real climate wisdom because you have no truth and just wanna be smart loking.

Those e-mails are stupid atempt by skeptic creeps to hold down the truth that we are in a big warm up.we lived in the warmest decade on record and you deniers will lie in anyway you can to hide it.

i am sure you will delete this post because you have done that many timmes and reason why there are no inteligent coments here since you deniers are afraid of real debate.i have seen it a lot and that is the truth..

i dare ya to post this truth.

Well, how about that! Our first shy posting. But not to worry, they always start by calling us names. This is their tried and true confidence building technique. Maybe one day we will get someone who will try to convert us by teaching us climate science that can be verified in the real world.

So far it is damn cold where I live. Been below zero celcius the last three nights and the warm Gulf Stream waters are just 100 yards from my house. And it is still December! Doesn't normally get this cold till late February.
Something is not right. It should be a mild winter. The BBC told me so.

Dear Guest,
There have been "alarmists" as you call them here. To date the only deletions have been for spam and porn reasons.
No one in my experience has been banned for asking reasonable questions.
So, let us see your reasoning / knowledge / questions.

BTW - Most of us here have been banned or deleted in AGW supporting forums, some from more than one.
None has been banned from anywhere that I'm aware of for spam or porn,
just simply putting forward good reasoning that the "consensus" did not want to answer.
Apparently it is far easier to ban a skeptical poster than answer the reasonable questions.

I hope you are a bit more civil in any further posts as you seem to be deliberately antagonising with your first somewhat vague post.

BTW - The moderating maxim around here is to let a fool hang himself, or herself, we ain't sexist, by their own petard.
So, we tend to leave idiotic posts in, just so others can see......

(12-27-2009 02:41 PM)Derek Wrote:  So, we tend to leave idiotic posts in, just so others can see......

Yeah, that's true, but unfortunately, he's (she's?) given "Guests" a bad name now.

(12-27-2009 04:21 PM)JohnWho Wrote:  

(12-27-2009 02:41 PM)Derek Wrote:  So, we tend to leave idiotic posts in, just so others can see......

Yeah, that's true, but unfortunately, he's (she's?) given "Guests" a bad name now.

There is one redeeming fact about this guest making a post here,it is the only one made by a guest in the forum.

I doubt there will be another one for a while because they seem afraid to post here in the GUEST forum.It would be nice if they can make a good comment about the forum or about the topic of interest.

LOL,

I dared to approve your "truth" post that was devoid of data.

Quote:BTW - The moderating maxim around here is to let a fool hang himself, or herself, we ain't sexist, by their own petard.
So, we tend to leave idiotic posts in, just so others can see......

Yup everything stays except the porno and obvious spamming.

All guest postings are subject to moderator approval,for the purpose of keeping out the porno and spamming and suspicious links (they can be edited out and post approved).

If you want to make a meaningful guest post (even a little light trolling can be tolerated) even from the AGW believing point of view,it will get approved.But still without the ..... porno and spamming.

(12-27-2009 04:54 PM)Sunsettommy Wrote:  Yup everything stays except the porno and obvious spamming.

Spam is deleted, but the porno goes into a special place for the Staff only.

Oh, wait - I'm not supposed to tell anyone that.

Oops.

I am obviously not on the "staff" then..........

Well I see no good reply from you deniers.idiotic post huh and you complain already.I did no porno stuf here and ya know it but ya all deniers anyway.must complain complain about something and still ya deny warming.

Nobody dared to prove me wrong either.those e-mails are taken out of contex and ya all know it.

The truth is too much for ya and I know why.

So you call my post idiotic when I was telling you deniers the truth that the decade is warmest on record.I see nobody showing me wrong and that is because ya aint go any comeback.

like the no comeback about the e-mails i said were what you deniers use with fear of being exposed as criminals,i hope they find the hacker and jail him.I will not be surprised it was a denier in pay of big oil.



What is all that about porno and spaming have to do with me i aint posting it so you can cut the cryin about it.



i aint afraid to post here but are you going to post this from a warmist you guys like to call me?

I dare ya to post this truth.

LOL,

The Guest forum is open to the world and ready to post in,subject to Moderator approval of course,and all we get is a weirdo guest.

Sadly she/he didn't read my response. I suggested that currently it is much colder than expected.
He/she seems to be in denial about the current global cooling period which was not forecast by any of those IPCC experts.

(12-28-2009 04:27 PM)Guest Wrote:  What is all that about porno and spaming have to do with me i aint posting it so you can cut the cryin about it.

Well, something I can say about you is that you lack reading comprehension, else you wouldn't have asked the above question-markless question.

Oh, where's your proof that the "decade is the warmest on record"? You are acting like a typical Warmist, making statements that have no factual backing. Are you Al Gore's grandson or granddaughter?

While I may agree that the "hacker" (if there is one) of the CRU data is probably a criminal, since he or she exposed a bunch of criminals, perhaps they can get a group rate and share a big jail cell? On the other hand, if the "hacker" is really a whistle blower, then some sort of award is in order. Wonder if there is a Nobel Prize for exposing the fraud around a Nobel Peace Prize winner?